Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Martin v. Hicks
as 6:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Latisha Martin
Defendant:
Alexander S. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Loveless v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2022cv00994
Petitioner:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Jason M Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loveless v. Peek et al
as 5:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Defendant:
Jim Peek, Jason M Hicks and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dollarhide v. Dickens et al
as 5:2022cv00642
Plaintiff:
Jason R Dollarhide
Defendant:
Dennis Dickens, Oklahoma Highway Patrol, Mike Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Progressive Well Service Inc et al v. Hanover Insurance Company et al
as 5:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Progressive Well Service Inc, Randy Matthews and Billy Matthews
Defendant:
Hanover Insurance Company and Michael R Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Hicks
as 6:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Latisha Martin
Defendant:
Alexander S. Hicks and John Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2021cv01042
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Hicks, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hicks v. Cobb
as 5:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
Alvin Hicks
Defendant:
Laurel Lee Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAlister v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2021cv00696
Plaintiff:
Nickales McAlister
Defendant:
Stephens County, Wayne McKinney, Javier Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2021cv00265
Defendant:
Stephens County, Bobby Lewis, Michael Eades and others
Plaintiff:
Rocky W Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
