Cases 11 - 20 of 2,468
Merritt et al v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brad Merritt, Billy Cunningham, Daniel Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Jackson
Defendant:
Blaine Mitchell Parker and Parker Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
JACKSON v. CITY OF MARSHALL et al
as 2:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tenya JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF MARSHALL, Chief City of Marshall Police Department, Antonio Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jakeway v. Schneider et al
as 4:2024cv01090
Defendant:
Lawrence M. Schneider, Laurence M. Schneider, Adam N. Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Donald Jakeway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Jakeway v. Schneider et al
as 4:2024mc00442
Defendant:
Lawrence M. Schneider, Laurence M. Schneider, Adam N. Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Donald Jakeway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jackson v. Pratt et al
as 6:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Pratt and Darbie Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Collier - TDCJ Director
as 6:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Tracy Lynn Jackson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
