Cases 11 - 20 of 43
LI et al v. MILLER et al
as 2:2021cv10777
Plaintiff:
Pengbo Li and Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Loren K. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
McClaine-Bey #165012 v. Bury et al
as 2:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
Lewis Henry McClaine-Bey #165012
Defendant:
Unknown Renard, Unknown Bury, Yubao Li and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffman v. Social Security
as 2:2019cv10843
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lis Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Li v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 2:2018mc51807
Respondent:
Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Biying Li
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 2:2018cv11739
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, Royal Oak, City of, Southfield, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 1:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, Royal Oak, City of, Southfield, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Lis et al
as 1:2018cv00287
Plaintiff:
Brad Harris
Defendant:
Mariusz Lis and Ecco Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta v. Hibachi Grill and Sushi Buffet, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00679
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Hibachi Grill and Sushi Buffet, Inc. and Li Yong Dong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Tian Li Restaurant, Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv00432
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Tian Li Restaurant, Inc., Jin Ling Ren and Shi Ju Xing
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hoffman v. Social Security
as 2:2016cv11336
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lis Hoffman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
