Cases 11 - 20 of 173
Garza v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Nelia Meza Garza
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IN THE MATTER OF RAYMOND MEZA
as 2:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
IN THE MATTER OF RAYMOND MEZA
Meza v. Monte Alto Independent School District et al
as 7:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Robert Meza
Defendant:
Monte Alto Independent School District and Rosalinda Cobarrubias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Meza v. State Farm Lloyds
as 7:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Carlos Meza
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Stoneham v. DeLeon et al
as 5:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Frank Stoneham
Defendant:
Michael DeLeon, Velia Meza, District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervain et al v. Hughs et al
as 4:2022mc00612
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Filed in Error
as 4:2022mc01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Meza v. Los Generales Construction LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Ramon Julio Meza
Defendant:
Los Generales Construction LLC, Alfonso Cavazos, Maria Delcarmen Cortes Avila and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
