Cases 11 - 20 of 387
Sevillano-Quinonez v. F.C.I. Otisville (Warden)
as 1:2023cv10799
Petitioner:
Romulo Genaro Sevillano-Quinonez
Respondent:
F.C.I. Otisville (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
(SS) Quinonez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Martin Quinonez, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CHAVEZ LETONA v. AMOR DE JESUS CORP et al
as 1:2023cv24299
Plaintiff:
MARIA ELENA CHAVEZ LETONA
Defendant:
AMOR DE JESUS CORP, SWEET LIVING FACILITY INC., JOSE MACHADO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
QUINONEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32448
Plaintiff:
JESSE QUINONEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
FILING ERROR
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Judith Quinonez
Defendant:
Gordon & Rees Attn: Cindy M. and Isiah Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
