Cases 11 - 20 of 848
Deans v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00480
Defendant:
Lois Fegan, J. Hampton, Blevins and others
Plaintiff:
Donshea O. Deans, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Defour v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00472
Defendant:
Investigator Stanley, Special Agent Acosta, Sergeant Steffey and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Defour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Walker v. Robinson et al
as 7:2024cv00465
Defendant:
E. Earhart, Sanders, Lt. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Jacques Lamar Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Rockbridge Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00457
Defendant:
Rockbridge Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Teigue et al
as 7:2024cv00450
Defendant:
R. Teigue, Chadwick Dotson, Kyle Rosch and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00437
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Meyers v. Pocahontas State Correctional Center et al
as 7:2024cv00443
Defendant:
C. Patterson, C. Smailling, Mr. Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sovereign v. Robinson et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, K. Bowles and R. Langford
Plaintiff:
Jonah Sovereign
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00406
Defendant:
Intel Officer R. Hickman, Intel Officer J.F. Harmon, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Plaintiff:
Ashan Ra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
