Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Baran et al v. County of Baltimore et al
as 1:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
Leah Elizabeth Baran , Lawrence McClain , Douglas W. Hansen and others
Defendant:
County of Baltimore, Maryland , Jim Johnson, County of Howard, Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv03291
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Schmidt
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schilling et al v. Schmidt Baking Company, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02498
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Schilling, Jr. , Russell E. Dolan and Jonathan A. Hecker
Defendant:
Schmidt Baking Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Schmidt v. State Auto Property And Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv01195
Plaintiff:
Irene Schmidt
Defendant:
State Auto Property And Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TEKsystems, Inc. v. Schmidt
as 1:2015cv00455
Plaintiff:
TEKsystems, Inc.
Defendant:
Philip P. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2014mc00358
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Lawrence P. Schmidt, Futuregen Company, Commercial Equity Partners, LTD. and others
Receiver:
Marion A. Hecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis Limited Consultants, LLC. v. In VisM, Inc. et al.
as 8:2014cv00510
Plaintiff:
Lewis Limited Consultants, LLC.
Defendant:
In VisM, Inc., Steve Weyl, Russ Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt Baking Co., Inc. v. Addison
as 1:2014mc00085
Petitioner:
Schmidt Baking Co., Inc.
Respondent:
Daryl Addison
Cause Of Action: Petition to Perpetuate Testimony
Schmidt Baking Co., Inc. v. Addison
as 1:2014mc00077
Petitioner:
Schmidt Baking Co., Inc.
Respondent:
Darryl Addison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
