Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04093
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jordan v. Buss et al
as 3:2018cv00981
Defendant: Lesnar, Parnell, Radatz and others
Plaintiff: Freemon Jordan, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. IDOC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00882
Defendant: Indiana State Prison, Verdon, Sherri Fritter and others
Plaintiff: Freemon Jordan, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00056
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
AVERETT et al v. METALWORKING LUBRICANTS CO. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01509
Plaintiff: TEAH AVERETT, CINDY MALLESS, EUGENE PARSLEY and others
Defendant: METALWORKING LUBRICANTS CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
AVERETT et al
as 1:2015cv01508
Plaintiff: TEAH AVERETT, CINDY MALLESS, EUGENE PARSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
MCGILL et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 4:2015cv00050
Defendant: ANTHEM, INC., BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, INC. and THE ANTHEM COMPANIES, INC.
Plaintiff: MATTHEW MCGILL and TIMOTHY WHALEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00009
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP v. WHALEN et al
as 1:2007cv01499
Plaintiff: COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP
Defendant: SANDRA WHALEN, CAPITAL ONE BANK, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?