Cases 11 - 20 of 14,031
Williams-Dorsey v. County of Chenango et al
as 9:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Davonte Williams-Dorsey
Defendant:
County of Chenango, Chenango County Sheriff's Office, Chenango County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briski v. Wythe County, Virgina et al
as 6:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
William Briski
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff C.D. Wright and Wythe County, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04527
Plaintiff:
Diquan Williams
Defendant:
City of New York and Police Officers John Doe #1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 2:2024cv04208
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Morrison v. Washington
as 9:2024cv00761
Petitioner:
William Morrison
Respondent:
M. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reddick v. County of Onondaga et al
as 9:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William H. Reddick, II
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Justice Center, Sheriff Tobias Shelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kostroun v. Vox Media, LLC
as 1:2024cv04512
Plaintiff:
William Kostroun
Defendant:
Vox Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
