Cases 11 - 20 of 36
RUBIN v. KANIA, et al.
as 2:2021cv20057
Plaintiff:
Bradley Rubin
Defendant:
Christopher Kania, Kevin Sayad, Frank Conti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. GOLDEN et al
as 3:2021cv19600
Plaintiff:
C.V. JANE DOE
Defendant:
SHERIFF SHAUN GOLDEN, CHIEF JEFFREY EQUILS, OFFICER THOMAS MAURO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEVERETTE v. GARRISON et al
as 2:2021cv03126
Defendant:
RAYMOND WEGRZYNEK, JOHN BASICH, ABC PUBLIC ENTITIES (1-100) and others
Plaintiff:
RAYVON LEVERETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BILLUPS v. PLUMER et al
as 2:2020cv11330
Defendant:
BELLEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ABC PUBLIC ENTITIES (1-100), REYNOL FERRER and others
Plaintiff:
LIMUEL BILLUPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2018cv16358
Defendant:
RAFAEL R CASTRO, JONATHAN LOPUSKI, JEFFREY ALMEIDA and others
Plaintiff:
KRYA HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv12795
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SERGEANT TAYLOR, CHARLES GREEN and others
Plaintiff:
SHYKIL FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WANG et al v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2018cv11933
Plaintiff:
PENG XIE and YUJIE WANG
Defendant:
JOSEPH FUENTES, TROOPER J CZECH, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al
as 2:2017cv02222
Plaintiff:
AKILAH N. MURPHY
Defendant:
CITY OF PLAINFIELD , ADAM GREEN , BRYAN BABER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2016cv05308
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RIVERA
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK , NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT , NEWARK POLICE OFFICER D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. SOTO et al
as 2:2016cv02551
Plaintiff:
KEYLIER HARRIS
Defendant:
F. SOTO, D. CRAWFORD, JOSEPH R. FUENTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
