Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv04198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rollins v. Cadence Education, LLC
as 2:2022cv02157
Plaintiff:
William E Rollins and Christi L Rollins
Defendant:
Cadence Education, LLC d/b/a Cadence Academy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Langley et al v. Dollard et al
as 2:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Langley, Robert R-Kell Pressley and Raeshawn Tyrek Langley
Defendant:
Officer Cassandra A. Dollard, Town of Hemingway, South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy et al
as 3:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard
Defendant:
South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy, Donald Rach, John Yarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Father Doe et al v. Whetstone Academy
as 8:2021cv01955
Defendant:
Whetstone Academy
Plaintiff:
Father Doe and Mother Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01446
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
