Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Amir McCain v. John Wetzel
as 12-3064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary Of Corrections, WENDY SHAYLOR, Grievance Coordinator, ALLISON and others
MCCAIN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv07241
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL , CHIEF, SECRETARY'S OFFICE OF INMATE GRIEVANCE & APPEALS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCAIN v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2009cv04153
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, C. DARNELL JONES, WEBSTER KEOGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amir McCain v. Episcopal Hosp, et al
as 09-3092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
EPISCOPAL HOSP and HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
MCCAIN v. EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2009cv02385
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL and HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amir McCain v. Episcopal Hosp, et al
as 09-2413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
EPISCOPAL HOSP and HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
MCCAIN v. EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2009cv00785
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL and HOSPITAL OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Amir McCain v. Lynne Abraham, et al
as 08-3375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Defendant:
LYNNE ABRAHAM
MCCAIN v. ABRAHAM et al
as 2:2008cv01613
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
LYNN ABRAHAM and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCAIN v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2008cv01530
Petitioner:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Respondent:
FRANKLIN J. TENNIS and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
