Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Andre Dennison v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-17432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Prison Operations and CANTEEN CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Food Service Provider
Andre Dennison v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-15865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Prison Operations and KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, Commissary Service Provider
Andre Dennison v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-15609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Prison Operations, ANTONIO BARRIOS, Deputy Warden, STACI FAY, Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Dennison v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02293
Plaintiff:
Andre Almond Dennison
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Betty Ulibarri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennison v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02294
Plaintiff:
Andre Almond Dennison
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Keefe Commissary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennison v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02292
Plaintiff:
Andre Almond Dennison
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Canteen Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennison # 143931 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02295
Plaintiff:
Andre Almond Dennison
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Antonio Barrios, Staci Fay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Dennison v. Charles Ryan
as 11-73103
Petitioner:
ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Andre Dennison v. USDC-AZP
as 10-72966
:
In re: ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Petitioner:
ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Real Party In Interest:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, RICHARD WESLEY PRATT, O'BRIEN and others
Andre Dennison v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 10-16469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Defendant - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, RICHARD WESLEY PRATT, O'BRIEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
