Cases filed in Washington
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bailey v. Cook Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00976
Plaintiff: Richard Bailey
Defendant: Cook Incorporated , Cook Group Incorporated , Cook Medical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv00573
Plaintiff: Christopher Gough
Defendant: Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical, LLC and William Cook Europe APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Gough v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2017cv05283
Plaintiff: Christopher Gough
Defendant: Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical, LLC and William Cook Europe APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01213
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01110
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Eslick v. Cook Medical Incorporated, et al.
as 2:2014cv00135
Plaintiff: Karen Eslick and Roy Eslick
Defendant: Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Incorporated, Cook Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A Thinking Ape, Inc. v. Lodsys Group, LLC
as 2:2012cv00883
Plaintiff: A Thinking Ape, Inc.
Defendant: Lodsys Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
New Carver Corp. v. PHX AP Acquisition, LLC
as 2:2010cv00493
Plaintiff: New Carver Corp.
Defendant: PHX AP Acquisition, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Muresan v. DSHS-APS
as 2:2007cv01783
Plaintiff: David Muresan
Defendant: DSHS-APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Muresan v. DSHS-APS
as 2:2007cv00062
Plaintiff: David Muresan
Defendant: DSHS-APS and DSHS-APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?