Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Kittila et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
William W. Kittila and Joanne L. Arnold
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc., First NLC Financial Services, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America, N.A. v. Fullum et al
as 1:2011cv00377
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Timothy J. Fullum and Arnold H. Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Riley v. United States et al
as 1:2008mc00021
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riley
Defendant:
United States, Thomas Colantuono, Robert Kinsella and others
Arnold v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv02023
Plaintiff:
David L. Arnold
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnold v. Johnson Truck Bodies, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00373
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arnold
Defendant:
Johnson Truck Bodies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Horowitz et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01865
Plaintiff:
Florence Horowitz, Arnold Horowitz and Ruth Ann Babcock
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norman Laurence v. A.T. Wall, et al
as 1:2007cv00081
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence
Defendant:
A.T. Wall, George A. Vose, Jake Gadsden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Laurence v. Wall et al
as 1:2007cv00066
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, II, William Begones, Joseph Forgue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold Lumber Co. v. Zicom, Inc., et al
as 1:2007cv00073
Plaintiff:
Arnold Lumber Co
Defendant:
Zicom, Inc, Daniel Canary, Premium Poly Patios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
