Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Al-Aissa v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
as 1:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Ahmed A. Al-Aissa
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marmelshtein v. City of Southfiled, et al.
as 9:2013mc00001
Plaintiff:
Leonid, et al. Marmelshtein
Defendant:
City of Southfiled, et al.
211 Eighth, LLC, Prince Creek Construction v. Town of Carbondale, et al
as 1:2012mc00008
Plaintiff:
211 Eighth, LLC, Prince Creek Construction
Defendant:
Town of Carbondale, et al
Ratcliff v. City of Red Lodge, Department of Police et al
as 1:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ratcliff
Defendant:
City of Red Lodge, Department of Police and Al Stuber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Beeson et al
as 6:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Al-Kaseem Little
Defendant:
Myron E. Beeson and Mark Lochrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Trade Commission v. Johnson et al
as 2:2011mc00001
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Jeremy Johnson, Duane Fielding, Andy Johnson and others
Dillon et al v. Forkner et al
as 6:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
Susan Dillon , Pamela Poynter , Shannon McNary and others
Defendant:
Lewella S. Forkner, J.C. Forkner, Fred C. Platt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Millennium Bank, et al. et al
as 6:2010mc00003
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Millennium Bank, et al., United Trust of Switzerland S.A., UT of S, LLC and others
Daniel v. Law et al
as 6:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Karen Camille Daniel
Defendant:
Sam Law, Attorney General of the State of Montana, Al Kinsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahoney v. Schweitzer et al
as 6:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Randall Scott Mahoney
Defendant:
Brian Schweitzer, Montana Department of Corrections, Mike Ferriter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
