Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Trans American Express, Inc. v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, etc.
as 0:2018cv61306
Plaintiff:
Trans American Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London subscribing to Policy No. B0142A172195
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Baker v. Dykema Gossett, LLP, et al
as 17-56506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BAKER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
DYKEMA GOSSETT, LLP, a professional law corporation; erroneously sued as Dykema LLP, WILLIAM F. DAVIS, a professional law corporation, MATTHEW FAIRSHTER, a professional law corporation and others
Robert Baker v. Dykema Gossett, LLP, et al
as 17-55989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BAKER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
DYKEMA GOSSETT, LLP, a professional law corporation; erroneously sued as Dykema LLP, WILLIAM F. DAVIS, a professional law corporation, MATTHEW FAIRSHTER, a professional law corporation and others
Robert Baker v. Dykema Gossett, LLP et al
as 2:2016cv08434
Defendant:
Philip Aidikoff, Robert Altman, American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
NEUSTIEN v. AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC.
as 3:2016cv03882
Plaintiff:
JOEL NEUSTIEN
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07341
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-56211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03956
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv10545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-56902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
