Cases 11 - 20 of 8,718
Rojas v. City of Gilroy et al
as 5:2024cv03206
Plaintiff:
Joe Rojas
Defendant:
City Of Gilroy, Michael McMahon, Officer Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Andrews v. Lee
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Andrews
Defendant:
Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levit v. Nature's Bakery, LLC
as 3:2024cv02987
Plaintiff:
Andrew Levit
Defendant:
Nature's Bakery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Espoire Ishibolecho v. Andrews DHS Attorney Gen
as 5:2024cv01043
Petitioner:
Espoire Ishibolecho
Respondent:
Andrews DHS Attorney Gen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Securities and Exchange Commission v. FAT Brands, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03913
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
FAT Brands, Inc., Andrew Wiederhorn, Ron Roe and others
Pina v. United States
as 4:2024cv02783
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jonathan Pina
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. LENNOX INDUSTRIES INC.
as 5:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Gonzales
Defendant:
LENNOX INDUSTRIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv03819
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
