Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Ramirez Urbina v. Orioso et al
as 1:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Penske, Selvin L. Orioso, Suburban Relocation Systems and others
Plaintiff:
Maria de los angeles Ramirez Urbina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miguel Ramirez v. William Barr
as 20-73088
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ
Miguel Ramirez-Garcia v. William Barr
as 20-4005
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ-GARCIA
Robert Ramirez v. Karen Barcklay, et al
as 20-15822
Defendant:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of A.D.O.C., CORIZON HEALTH, JOSEPH BRISBOIS, Nurse Practioner at A.D.O.C. Yuma Cibola Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANGEL RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN BARCKLAY, Medical Provider at A.D.O.C. Yuma Complex
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66232
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61477
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angel Ramirez et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2020cv00369
Plaintiff:
Angel Ramirez, Angel Cadena and Alberto Ramirez
Defendant:
Michelle Louise Morris, Edward Lawrence Kerin, Edward Lawrence Morris Kerin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miguel Ramirez v. William Barr
as 19-72784
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ
USA v. Mendez
as 5:2018mj00321
Material Witne:
Crisanto Acosta-Bermudez, Moise Maya Pala, Nestor Perez-Antonio and others
Defendant:
Jose Guillermo Mendez (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Jose Guillermo Mendez
as 5:2018mj00321
Material Witne:
Crisanto Acosta-Bermudez, Moise Maya Pala, Nestor Perez-Antonio and others
Defendant:
Jose Guillermo Mendez (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
