Cases 1 - 10 of 91
United States of America v. Chavez
as 24-963
Defendant:
RAUL CHAVEZ, ANDREW DURON, JESSIE ROSALES and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramirez-Tecorralco v. Garland
as 24-2150
Petitioner:
ANGEL RAMIREZ-TECORRALCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Ibarra-Mora
as 23-50880
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Angel Ibarra-Mora, also known as Miguel Angel Ibarra, also known as Miguel Angel Mora-Ibarra, also known as Miguel Angel Ramirez
Achane et al v. Tolbert et al
as 1:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Achane, Natasha Adams, Kayla Anderson and others
Defendant:
Jim Tolbert, EFG General Partner Corp., Education Futures Management, Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Chavez
as 22-1559
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew Duron, AKA Chavo, Jessie Rosales, AKA Alex, Angel Ramirez and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Chavez, AKA Sonny
Ramirez-Ruiz v. Garland
as 21-1374
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ-RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vila-Castro, et al v. Garland
as 21-2011
Petitioner:
KARIN VILA-CASTRO, ADRIANA ANDREA RAMIREZ-VILA and DANIEL ANGEL RAMIREZ-SALAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Ramirez v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2021cv00439
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Ramirez
Respondent:
James Dzurenda, Christopher Dericco, Russell Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Delgado v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 6:2021cv01142
Plaintiff:
Yasenka Delgado
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Angel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00735
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
