Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Stanley v. Macomb et al
as 2:2017cv12800
Plaintiff:
James Stanley
Defendant:
County Macomb, Anthony M. Wickersham and Walter Zimney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIlline v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2017cv12723
Plaintiff:
Alverez MIlline
Defendant:
Macomb, County of, Anthony M. Wickersham, Correctcare Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Osborn et al
as 2:2017cv11966
Plaintiff:
Raymone S. Knox
Defendant:
Osborn, Anthony M. Wickersham, County of Macomb and others
Stojcevski v. County of Macomb et al
as 4:2017cv11843
Defendant:
County of Macomb, Anthony M. Wickersham, Michelle M Sanborn and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Stojcevski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
St. Pieree v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2016cv12530
Plaintiff:
Cecil St. Pieree
Defendant:
Macomb, County of , Anthony M. Wickersham , Allison LaFriniere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowans et al v. Dupris et al
as 4:2015cv12739
Plaintiff:
Mark Cowans, Desmond Turner, Peter Labreck and others
Defendant:
Kyle Dupris, Anthony M. Wickersham and Macomb County Sheriff's Department
Prison Legal News v. Wickersham et al
as 2:2015cv12350
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News
Defendant:
Anthony M. Wickersham , Michelle Sanborn , Macomb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stojcevski et al v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2015cv11019
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Stojcevski and David Stojcevski
Defendant:
Macomb, County of, Anthony M. Wickersham, Michelle M Sanborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagerman v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2015cv10952
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hagerman
Defendant:
Macomb, County of , Anthony M. Wickersham , Amy Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keys v. Central Mortgage Company et al
as 2:2013cv13818
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Keys
Defendant:
Central Mortgage Company, John C Foster and Anthony M. Wickersham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
