Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Arp v. General Motors, LLC.
as 3:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
Karl Arp
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Hernandez v. Wilson et al
as 6:2013cv00164
Defendant:
FNU Arps, FNU Brown, FNU Chaney and others
Plaintiff:
Maxine Kendrick Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Wilson et al
as 1:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Maxine Kendrick Hernandez
Defendant:
FNU Wilson, FNU Maryland, FNU Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arp v. Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp.
as 4:2013cv00166
Plaintiff:
Julie Katherine Arp
Defendant:
Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Golden v Kowaiski, et al
as 4:2010cv00353
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Golden
Defendant:
Doug Kowaiski, Joe Arp, Marcus D. Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $39,584.30 in funds seized from account no. xxxxxx6882 in the name of Kutob LLC d/b/a Pine Tree Food Mart at Austin Bank et al
as 6:2010cv00124
Defendant:
$39,584.30 in funds seized from account no. xxxxxx6882 in the name of Kutob LLC d/b/a Pine Tree Food Mart at Austin Bank, $20,140.26 in funds seized from account no. xxx9708 in the name of Kutob LLC d/b/a ARP Food Store at American State Bank and $3,642.28 in funds seized from account no. xxx3681 in the name of Saeb Kutob at American State Bank
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Hereford v. Williams et al
as 5:2009cv00109
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Hereford, Jr
Defendant:
Tony Williams, Jim Holmes, Rusty Arp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arp et al v. Surgical Specialties Corporation
as 4:2007cv00614
Defendant:
Surgical Specialties Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ann Arp and James Arp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
