Cases 11 - 20 of 72
HOLDEN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ODF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2019cv00401
Petitioner:
PHILLIP A. HOLDEN and ABDUL-RAHIM MUSLIM
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TURNER v. JOHNSON
as 3:2018cv17384
Petitioner:
MAURICE TURNER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, WARDEN and PROSECUTOR OF MERCER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLEMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv13181
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY and STEVEN JOHNSON
Petitioner:
KESHAWN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCRIMMON v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv08166
Petitioner:
RASOOL MCCRIMMON
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PALADINO v. BONDS et al
as 2:2018cv03199
Petitioner:
BRIAN J. PALADINO
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS, GARY M. LANIGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HWANG v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2018cv01007
Petitioner:
WOOJIN HWANG
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
KIRKLAND BEY v. PENNSAUKEN MUNICIPAL COURT et al
as 1:2017cv09019
Plaintiff:
ATIYA KIRKLAND BEY
Defendant:
PENNSAUKEN MUNICIPAL COURT, STEVEN M. PETRILLO, DONNA M. KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS et al
as 1:2017cv08446
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, GREYHOUND BUS, ANTHONY SWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS et al
as 1:2017cv08448
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, CCMSI CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, GREYHOUND BUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv04739
Petitioner:
COREY MORRIS
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
