Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Biccum et al v. City of Watertown, et al
as 7:2016cv00645
Plaintiff:
Kristi Lynn Biccum , T.B., J.B., J.B., and B.B. and James Biccum
Defendant:
City of Watertown, New York , Watertown, New York Police Department , Charles Donoghue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B.B. et al v. Response Wordwide Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00417
Plaintiff:
B.B., Jr. and Alexis Estrada
Defendant:
Response Worldwide Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06342
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Iacovangelo v. Correctional Medical Care, Incorporated et al
as 6:2013cv06466
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Iacovangelo
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Care, Inc., Emre Umar, Registered Nurse T.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv03596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Sroka v. Welcher, B.B.
as 1:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A. Sroka
Defendant:
Welcher, B.B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Instant Response Systems, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00976
Defendant:
Jason Abraham, B.B. Mercantile, Ltd., Instant Response Systems, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
