Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Benefield v. Capital One Bank (USA), National Association
as 1:2016cv01868
Plaintiff:
John Benefield
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
JAMISON et al v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL et al
as 5:2016mc00002
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER P JAMISON, JOHN CARTWRIGHT, DAVID EDWARD MARCU and others
Defendant:
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL and LEE MOAK
Berry et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04255
Plaintiff:
Freeman Berry
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Deborah C. Benefield, Bonnie Kay Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holmes v. State of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02734
Plaintiff:
John Holmes
Defendant:
Benefield, Tracy G. Lawson, Renee Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caswell v. Pathways Center for Developmental and Behavioral Growth et al
as 3:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Justin Caswell
Defendant:
Pathways Center for Developmental and Behavioral Growth and Jade Benefield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bey v. Superior Court Clayton County et al
as 1:2014cv03404
Petitioner:
Eli Malik-Jamil Bey
Respondent:
Superior Court Clayton County and Deborah C. Benefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Horton v. Degennaro et al
as 1:2013cv03869
Plaintiff:
Charles Horton
Defendant:
Nicholas Degennaro, Charles Sedberry, David Benefield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moses v. Benefield et al
as 1:2013cv03418
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Moses
Defendant:
Steven Benefield, Supervalu Transportation, Inc. and Old Republic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thornton v. Benefield et al
as 1:2013cv03206
Plaintiff:
Georgette Benita Thornton
Defendant:
Deborah C. Benefield, Benham and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENEFIELD v. COLVIN
as 4:2013cv00067
Plaintiff:
JOANN BENEFIELD
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
