Cases 11 - 20 of 957
Joao Batista Dos Santos, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10601
Petitioner:
JOAO BATISTA DOS SANTOS, IRENE GONCALVES DE ALMEIDA and RAFAELA GONCALVES DOS SANTOS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aigbekaen v. Gillepsie
as 24-428
Defendant:
WARDEN, WARDEN, FCI Danbury, GILLEPSIE, Lt., DURANT, Lt. and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Parker et al v. Persona Identities, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
Trey Parker and Jessica Batista
Defendant:
Persona Identities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Batista Martinez v. Perez Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Juan Batista Martinez
Defendant:
Artavia Perez Bryant and CH2 Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
USA v. Roberto Batista Jean Francois
as 24-10111
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO JAVIER BATISTA JEAN FRANCOIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Simon et al v. Construction Services Consulting NY Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11058
Plaintiff:
Ramon Argeny Batista Simon and Leonardo Jesus Pastran Garban
Defendant:
Construction Services Consulting NY Inc., Stephen Mckenna and Construction Services Consulting NY Inc. doing business as Celtic Scaffold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
James v. Batista
as 1:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Damario L. James
Defendant:
Dr. Batista
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
