Cases 1 - 10 of 956
ANDUJAR et al v. HUB GROUP TRUCKING, INC.
as 2:2024cv02296
Plaintiff:
JORGE ANDUJAR and FRANKLIN PENA BATISTA
Defendant:
Hub Group Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Anderson et al v. City of New York
as 1:2024cv03473
Plaintiff:
Francesca Anderson, Sabretha Ervin Turner, Sabrina Morell and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Flores v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronnys Batista Flores
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Malcolm Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Guzman-Perez, et al v. Ojeda-Batista
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
JENNIE GUZMAN-PEREZ and MARIA HERNANDEZ-SANTIAGO
Defendant:
MANUEL OJEDA-BATISTA, PROFESSIONAL EQUIPMENT CORP. and MOB INVESTMENT CORP.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Soto-Sanchez
as 24-1184
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
VICTOR SOTO-SANCHEZ, a/k/a Newton Batista, a/k/a Hooka
Joao Batista Dos Santos, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10601
Petitioner:
JOAO BATISTA DOS SANTOS, IRENE GONCALVES DE ALMEIDA and RAFAELA GONCALVES DOS SANTOS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
