Cases 11 - 20 of 24
BELLAMY v. MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv02426
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BELLAMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bellamy v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv06093
Plaintiff:
ANITA BELLAMY
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC, Takeda Development Center Americas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BELLAMY
as 1:2016cv04511
Plaintiff:
KELVIN BELLAMY
Cause Of Action: Right to re-employment of inducted persons
BELLAMY v. BONHAM et al
as 1:2015cv08520
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BELLAMY
Defendant:
M BONHAM, TURNER, T TRUITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLAMY v. BONHAM et al
as 2:2015cv08520
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BELLAMY
Defendant:
M BONHAM, TURNER, T TRUITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUMAS et al v. ACCURATE MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION et al
as 3:2015cv02748
Plaintiff:
DALORD DUMAS , JENNIFER BELLAMY , SERENITY PINKNEY and others
Defendant:
ACCURATE MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION and JOE COHEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BELLAMY v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2013cv07783
Petitioner:
AARON BELLAMY
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PEGUERO et al v. CITY OF UNION CITY et al
as 2:2012cv06045
Plaintiff:
CARLENE PEGUERO and INGRID DE CASTRO
Defendant:
CITY OF UNION CITY, CHARLES EVERETT, MARK JULVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
