Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Bey v. Jordan et al
as 3:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Chief Judge Daniel P. Jordan, Judge F. Keith Ball, Clerk Arthur Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Boone et al
as 3:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
Richard Amum'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Magistrate Steven Boone, State of Mississippi, Phil Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bey v. Raymond Detention Center
as 3:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Richard Amum'Ra Bey and Richard Conrad Johnson
Defendant:
Raymond Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pritter v. Reizer
as 3:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
Curtis Pritter and Michael Francios-Bey
Defendant:
Warden S. Reizer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Meg Bartlett, State of Mississippi, U. S. Marshals and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Amum'Ra Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. Withers et al
as 3:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Micah Gordon and Micah Gordon-Bey
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden SD Withers and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gordon-Bey v. Withers et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Micah J. Gordon-Bey and Micah J. Gordon
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden S. D. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bey v. City of Flowood
as 3:2020cv00490
Plaintiff:
El Wesim Ventura Bey
Defendant:
City of Flowood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2020cv00491
Plaintiff:
El Wesim Ventura Bey
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Mississippi Highway Patrol et al
as 3:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Mississippi Highway Patrol and H. Mullins
Plaintiff:
Divina Clara laspis Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
