Cases 11 - 20 of 234
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, et al
as 22-3061
Counter Defendant:
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION
Not Yet Classified:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC.
Defendant:
ALLIED WORLD SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, FKA Darwin National Assurance Company
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant:
Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Torrey v. Infectious Diseases Socty
as 21-40782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Torrey, Kathryn Kocurek, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of J. David Kocurek, Ph.D., Amy Hanneken and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Infectious Diseases Society of America, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Aetna, Incorporated and others
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
as 1:2021cv02805
Counter Defendant:
JANE SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
3Rd Party Defendant:
CORAM CVS SPECIALTY INFUSION SERVICES, CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, INC. doing business as CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD, GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. doing business as CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mishanta Reyes
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Lexington Insurance Company v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
as 1:2021cv04398
Plaintiff:
Lexington Insurance Company
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
