Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Falcon v. Bogopa Service Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv06230
Plaintiff:
Serveriano Falcon
Defendant:
Bogopa Service Corp. , John Doe Corps 1-18 and Spencer An
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gomez et al v. Bogopa Madison LLC et al
as 1:2017cv05006
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Gomez
Defendant:
Bogopa Madison LLC, Tony Corona and Rodolfo Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03420
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01221
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Now Called Atria:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kim v. Bogopa Services Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv04024
Defendant:
Hwee Ill An and Bogopa Services Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bong Chul Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KIM v. BOGOPA SERVICES CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv02174
Defendant:
BOGOPA SERVICES CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BONG CHUL KIM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Kim v. Bogopa Services Corporation
as 1:2015cv02174
Defendant:
Bogopa Services Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bong Chul Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Casiano et al v. Bogopa Service Corp. et al
as 3:2012cv01487
Plaintiff:
Albertino Casiano , Juan Mellado and Palma Esquivel Jose Amilcar
Defendant:
Bogopa Service Corp., Hwee Ill An, Bogopa Bridgeport, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
