Cases 11 - 20 of 149
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2022cv05937
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Chief Judge Diane Sykes, Clerk Thomas Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2022cv05786
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Chief Judge Diane Sykes, Thomas Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. v. Brennan
as 1:2022cv03410
Plaintiff:
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Tom Brennan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Beathard v. Lyons et al
as 1:2021cv01352
Plaintiff:
Kurt Beathard
Defendant:
Larry Lyons, Brock Spack and Kyle Brennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mohammed v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2021cv06054
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
United States of America, Clerk Thomas Bruton, Executive Committee of the District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mohammed v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2021cv06058
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
United States of America, Clerk Thomas Bruton, Executive Committee of the District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Emery v. Brennan
as 1:2021cv01297
Petitioner:
Donald L Emery
Respondent:
Christine Brennan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mohammed v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv05568
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
United States of America, Thomas Bruton, Executive Committee of the District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mohammed v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Legal Services Corporation, Prairie State Legal Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
