Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
BRIGHT v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00385
Petitioner: TONY BRIGHT
Miscellaneou: PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00025
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00358
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00357
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00133
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00205
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Worrell v. Bright Coop Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00334
Estate_plaintiff: Terra Lynn Worrell
Defendant: Bright Coop Inc and Viking Trailers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01690
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ZITZKA v. VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
as 1:2009mc00057
Plaintiff: ZITZKA
Defendant: VILLAGE OF WESTMONT, JAMES SCHLICHER, MICHAEL DALE and others
ZITZKA et al v. THE VILLAGE OF WESTMONT et al
as 1:2008mc00229
Plaintiff: DAWN M. ZITZKA and JOHN ZITZKA
Defendant: THE VILLAGE OF WESTMONT, JAMES SCHLICHER, MICHAEL DALE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?