Cases 11 - 20 of 318
Brooks v. Topaz Super Carwash et al
as 2:2023cv02060
Plaintiff:
Zalton E Brooks
Defendant:
Topaz Super Carwash and Bruno Bernada, Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sternberg v. Warneck et al
as 2:2023cv02022
Plaintiff:
Michael C Sternberg
Defendant:
Shelley Warneck, Tristan Aeschleman, Cindy Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 2:2023cv01575
Plaintiff:
Shane Donavan Brooks
Defendant:
Roman, Weiland, Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Silva
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Department of Public Safety, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Rigney et al
as 2:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brooks
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, James Weiland, Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crane v. Clark County Co. D.A. Offices et al
as 2:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Stanley Crane
Defendant:
Clark County Co. D.A. Offices, District Attorneys Office, Steven B. Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freshwadda v. Boutos et al
as 2:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
R.O. Brooks Freshwadda
Defendant:
Nicholas Boutos, Kenneth Bourne, Genaro Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Hubbell et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
James L. Brooks
Defendant:
Reno Police Dept., Paul Hubbell, D. Tallman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oum v. Brooks et al
as 2:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Viet Oum
Defendant:
Adam Brooks, Bail Bond Specialists and Stratosphere Hotel Casino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
