Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Luckett v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00074
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, James LeBlanc, Louisiana State Police Crime Laboratory and others
Plaintiff:
Tonnie C. Luckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00017
Petitioner:
Freddie J. Banks
Respondent:
Burl N. Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roy Williams v. Burl Cain, et al
as 14-31269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL N. CAIN, Warden, UNKNOWN MANZINA, Assistant Warden, UNKNOWN SCHALES, Major and others
Williams v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00579
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, Ernest Griffin, Unknown Manzina and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2014cv01116
Plaintiff:
Arthur R Robinson
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, Chris Evans, Angie Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luckett v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00153
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, James Lablanc and Robert E. Barrow, Jr. Treatment Center
Plaintiff:
Tonnie Luckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Poret et al
as 3:2014cv00096
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, James M. LaBlanc, Unknown Perkin and others
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2013cv00798
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, Jason Collons and James LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Terry Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckett v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00722
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain and James Lablanc
Plaintiff:
Tonnie Luckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00491
Defendant:
Kevin Benjamin, Burl N. Cain, Chadwick Darbonne and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
