Cases 11 - 19 of 19
John Folsom v. Indymac Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv03812
Plaintiff:
Michael B Coady, Robert C. Daniels, John Folsom and others
Objector:
Scott Van Dellen
Defendant:
Ernst & Young LLP, Indymac Bancorp, Inc., A. Scott Keys and others
Unknown:
Michael C Tu, Ramzi Abadou, Teodora Manolova and others
Movant:
Local 731 Group
Trustee:
Alfred H. Siegel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Mary C Daniel v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2013cv00448
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Mary C Daniel
Daniels v. Harrell et al
as 4:2012cv02546
Plaintiff:
Scott C. Daniels
Defendant:
Frank (Francis) Harrell and City of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neal v. Daniels et al
as 1:2011cv01361
Petitioner:
Denard Darnell Neal
Respondent:
United States Penitentiary Atwater , Cassandra Harris , Kimberly Kodger and others
Defendant:
C. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joshua Todd Woolridge v. C Daniel Faulhaber
as 5:2010cv01116
Defendant:
C Daniel Faulhaber and C Daniel Faulhaber
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Leon C Daniel v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2010cv00262
Defendant:
Jonetta Anderson, County of Riverside, Jensen and others
Plaintiff:
Leon C Daniel
Simmons v. Equity 1 Lending, Inc., et al.
as 2:2009cv01895
Plaintiff:
Gary T. Simmons
Defendant:
Equity 1 Lending, Inc., Michael C. Noble, C. Daniel Debruno and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1461 Homeowners Loan Act
Robert C. Daniels v. Michael W. Perry et al
as 2:2008cv05073
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Daniels, Robert C. Daniels, Robert C. Daniels and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Perry and A. Scott Keys
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Daniels v. Alameda County Sheriffs Dept.
as 3:2007cv00618
Plaintiff:
James C. Daniels
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
