Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Briles et al v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
as 4:2010cv00163
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Briles , Jeff Heifort, Howard Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Burdock v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Cathy Burdock
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Jordan Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Ney Leasing Corporation, Inc. v. Cargill Meat Logistics Solutions, Inc., f/k/a Wispak Transport, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01051
Plaintiff:
Ney Leasing Corporation, Inc. and Ney Leasing Corporation, Inc.
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Logistics Solutions, Inc., f/k/a Wispak Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Raymie v. Raymie et al
as 4:2009cv00222
Defendant:
Penny Raymie, The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Cargill, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Penny Raymie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ney Leasing Corporation, Inc v. Cargill Meat Logistics Solutions, Inc
as 2:2008cv01041
Plaintiff:
Ney Leasing Corporation, Inc
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Logistics Solutions, Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Raymie v. Cargill, Incorporated
as 4:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
Penny Raymie
Defendant:
Cargill, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1210 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1210 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
