Cases 11 - 20 of 25
De Jesus v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv05741
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Roberto Carlos De Jesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Quiles-Maldonado v. Correctional Psychiatric Hospital et al
as 3:2015cv01165
Plaintiff:
Nanyeli N. Quiles-Maldonado
Defendant:
Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, Dra Sylvia P. Johnson, Forensic Psychiatric Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Juan Garcia-Moreno v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72410
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE GARCIA-MORENO, AKA Carlos De Jesus Aquino-Borja
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rodriguez et al v. Obam Management Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00463
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos De Jesus Rodriguez , Luis Lliguin and Mario Gomez
Defendant:
Obam Management Inc., Pita Grill Murray Hill LLC, PitaGrillNYC Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Charles Wang v. Carlos De Jesus, et al
as 12-16798
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WANG
Respondent - Appellee:
CARLOS DE JESUS, STATE CDCR HEAD, DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Juan Garcia-Moreno v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71962
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE GARCIA-MORENO, AKA Carlos De Jesus Aquino-Borja
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
De Jesus v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 11-1703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos De Jesus
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Charles Wang v. Carlos De Jesus, et al
as 11-15244
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WANG
Respondent - Appellee:
CARLOS DE JESUS, STATE CDCR HEAD, DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
De Jesus v. Primo Deli, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00449
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos De Jesus
Defendant:
Primo Deli, Inc. and Hyo Bum Park
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
