Cases 11 - 20 of 369
Loomis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Loomis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Searles v. Baldauf
as 3:2023cv02394
Petitioner:
Carolyn S. Searles
Respondent:
Warden Teri Baldauf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03995
Plaintiff:
Carolyn S. Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00346
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Carolyn E.M. Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
White v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00768
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc, Hospira Worldwide, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Turnbow Avery v. Postmaster General
as 1:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Ray Turnbow Avery
Defendant:
Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Antalocy v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 4:2023cv02098
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Antalocy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Froehlich v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03114
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Froehlich
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
