Cases 11 - 20 of 30
MARGOLIS et al v. CECIL
as 1:2022mc00022
3Rd Party Defendant:
JAMES MARGOLIS
Plaintiff:
ROY S. MOORE
Defendant:
GUY CECIL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03725
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CROSSFIT, INC. et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2018cv02296
Plaintiff:
CROSSFIT, INC., U.S. RIGHT TO KNOW and ANDREA MARIA CECIL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CECIL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv01788
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE CECIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMSTRONG v. SELECT CONTRACTORS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00153
Defendant:
SELECT CONTRACTORS, INC. and CECIL HARRIS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
as 1:2017cv02834
Plaintiff:
CARL PARKER, EDDIE SLAUGHTER, LUCIOUS ABRAMS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
HOLT v. WALSH GROUP, et al.
as 1:2017cv01173
Plaintiff:
CECIL HOLT
Defendant:
WALSH GROUP , PROSPECT WATERPROOFING COMPANY , AES CLEAN TECHNOLOGY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SIMPSON et al v. GREAT SOCIALIST PEOPLE'S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA et al
as 1:2008cv00529
Plaintiff:
VICTOR SIMPSON, DANIELLA SIMPSON, MICHAEL SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
GREAT SOCIALIST PEOPLE'S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA, LIBYAN INTERNAL SECURITY, LIBYAN EXTERNAL SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
