Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Hartman v. Sackler et al
as 1:2021op45117
Plaintiff:
Paul Hartman
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Sackler, David Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt and others
Price v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01493
Plaintiff:
Cecil Price
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02909
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
LINDA JACKSON and CECIL JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scarbrough v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv02676
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Cecil B Scarbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scarbrough v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv02316
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard
Plaintiff:
Cecil B Scarbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02271
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cecile Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lathan et al v. Rutter et al
as 3:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Darek Lathan, Kelley Lee, Richard Stewart and others
Defendant:
John Tharp, Alex Rutter, Dennis Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Little v. Sheldon
as 3:2020cv02527
Petitioner:
Cecil Little
Respondent:
Warden Ed Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jetter et al v. City of Cincinnati
as 1:2020cv00581
Plaintiff:
Alberta Harris, Dennis Howell, Cecil Howell and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jenkins et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv03775
Plaintiff:
Cecil R. Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
