Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Adkins et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Terry Ennis Adkins , Issac Aguilar , Sevim Aybulut and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC , KBR, Inc. , Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Chandler v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2015cv00685
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Chandler
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis US LLC , Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Blades et al
as 1:2015cv00394
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Jackson
Defendant:
Dean Blades, James Chandler, Truman Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shockley v. Burke et al
as 1:2013cv00463
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Shockley, Jr.
Defendant:
Veronica Burke, Heather Marie Chandler-Smith, G.R. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Chandler et al
as 1:2011cv00860
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Thornton
Defendant:
Chandler, Lawson, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Stark et al
as 1:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Smith and Helen S. Starchia
Defendant:
Leonard P. Stark, Paul S. Diamond, William B. Chandler, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Meyers et al
as 1:2011cv00126
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Smith and Helen S. Starchia
Defendant:
Patricia A. Meyers , Leonard P. Stark and William B. Chandler, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schoolfield v. Deloy et al
as 1:2010cv00410
Plaintiff:
Charles N. Schoolfield
Defendant:
Michael Deloy, Angus MacLennan, Veronica Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nihon Tsushin Kabushiki Kaisha v. Davidson et al
as 1:2007cv00619
Plaintiff:
Nihon Tsushin Kabushiki Kaisha
Defendant:
Donald Davidson, David Izatt, J. Chandler Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
