Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Ellis v. Montgomery et al
as 5:2013cv02502
Plaintiff:
Michael D Ellis
Defendant:
Dale N Montgomery, II, Charles Rex Scott, Unknown Assistant District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cade v. Scott et al
as 5:2013cv02298
Plaintiff:
Mickey Cade
Defendant:
Charles Rex Scott, Unknown Assistant District Attorney, Ramona L Emanuel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamil v. Scott et al
as 5:2013cv02200
Plaintiff:
Mark Douglas Hamil
Defendant:
Charles Rex Scott, Gregory Scott Brady, Amanda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuels v. Pierce et al
as 5:2013cv01577
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Leonard Pierce, William Tuggle, Steve Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamil v. Scott et al
as 5:2013cv00694
Plaintiff:
Mark Douglas Hamil
Defendant:
Charles Rex Scott, William Nader, Alan J Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Phan et al
as 5:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
David Lee Hill
Defendant:
Hai Phan, Unknown S P D Officer, Willie Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Scott
as 5:2013cv00577
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Jawann Foster
Defendant:
Charles Rex Scott, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton-El v. Marcotte et al
as 5:2012cv01219
Plaintiff:
Melody Smith Wilson
Defendant:
Craig Marcotte, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish and Charles Rex Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Louis White v. Buddy Caldwell, et al
as 12-30170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
BUDDY CALDWELL, HUGO HOLLAND and CHARLES REX SCOTT
Mastin v. Glover et al
as 5:2011cv02240
Plaintiff:
Sean Patrick Mastin
Defendant:
Cedric Glover, Parish of Caddo, Steve Prater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
