Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MCKIE v. PHILADELPHIA CI AND FBI INFORMANTS et al
as 2:2018cv01805
Plaintiff:
CRYSTALEAN MCKIE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CI AND FBI INFORMANTS, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CASEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER et al v. PALACE ELITE RESORTS, S.A. DE C.V. et al
as 2:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
KELSEY T. BAKER and FRANK W. BAKER
Defendant:
PALACE ELITE RESORTS, S.A. DE C.V., MY TIMESHARE OPTIONS, DAN BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PONOMARENKO v. CI GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04656
Plaintiff:
SVETLANA PONOMARENKO
Defendant:
CI GROUP, INC., SHERRI WHITE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PARR v. ABEX CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv61443
Defendant:
EARL K. JOHNSON , ABEX CORP., INC. ACANDS and others
Plaintiff:
PERRY E. PARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. ABEX CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv61444
Defendant:
EARL K. JOHNSON , ABEX CORP., INC. ACANDS and others
Plaintiff:
VIOLET JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2010cv61442
Defendant:
EARL K. JOHNSON , ABEX CORP., INC. ACANDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dutton-Myrie v. Corbett et al
as 3:2010cv00354
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Dutton-Myrie
Defendant:
Attorney General Tho Corbett, Emporium Borough Police Dept., Officer Rufus Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROSKA v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68533
Plaintiff:
AGATHA BROSKA
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CI FACILITY, JOHN HOUDAILLE-CRANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CLARK v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67439
Plaintiff:
DENNIS R. CLARK
Defendant:
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
