Cases 11 - 20 of 23
West v. City of Caldwell et al
as 1:2016cv00359
Plaintiff:
Shaniz West
Defendant:
City of Caldwell , City of Caldwell Police Department , Chris Allgood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braden et al v. City of Caldwell, et al
as 1:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Tyler Braden and Stephanie Keyes
Defendant:
City of Caldwell , Chris Algood , Larry Hemmert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Sorenson v. City of Caldwell, a subdivision of the state of Idaho et al
as 1:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Lynn Sorenson
Defendant:
City of Caldwell, a subdivision of the state of Idaho, CITY OF CALDWELL DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION and KENNETH WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Douglas Brown v. City of Caldwell
as 12-35881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CALDWELL, a subdivision of the State of Idaho
Ramona Twist v. STATE OF IDAHO, et al
as 12-35488
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAMONA TWIST
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, CANYON COUNTY, CANYON PROSECUTORS and others
Twist v. Canyon County et al
as 4:2012cv00156
Petitioner:
Ramona Twist
Respondent:
Canyon County, City of Caldwell, Canyon Prosecutors and others
Defendant:
Canyon Sherriffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Twist v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ramona Twist
Defendant:
Canyon County, City of Caldwell, Canyon Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Caldwell et al
as 1:2010cv00536
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Brown
Defendant:
City of Caldwell , Mark Wendelsdorf , Garret Nancolas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
