Cases 11 - 20 of 54
GANNOM v. WINKLE et al
as 1:2020cv02362
Defendant:
MATT MCCONNELL, COREY POSEY, CHASE HUNTER and others
Plaintiff:
LONNIE E GANNOM and LONNIE E. GANNOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAX et al v. KIRKLAND et al
as 1:2020cv02267
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE SANDRA MARIE LAX and CRYSTAL LAX
Defendant:
JOHNNY LEWIS KIRKLAND, SR., JOHNNY LEWIS KIRKLAND, JR. and CITY OF MUNCIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAX v. COMPLETE PROPERTY CARE MANAGER, et al.
as 1:2020cv01938
Defendant:
CITY OF MUNCIE MAYOR, COMPLETE PROPERTY CARE MANAGER AND THE PRIVATE OWNER OF UNIT 807 S SHIPLEY STREET and EPIC INSURANCE SOLUTION
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL LAX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MONTERO v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2020cv01375
Defendant:
CHIEF OF POLICE JOSEPH WINKLE, ZACHARY OSBORN, CHASE HUNTER and others
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL MONTERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAX v. CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA
as 1:2020cv01358
Defendant:
CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL LAX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEUMANN v. CITY OF MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00915
Plaintiff:
KYLE NEUMANN
Defendant:
MAVERICK RASTAKHIZ, CITY OF MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT and JON HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIXELL v. BERGER et al
as 1:2020cv00433
Defendant:
MATTHEW BERGER, DELAWARE COUNTY DRUG TASKFORCE and CITY OF MUNCIE
Plaintiff:
LAUREN M. MIXELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARDIZZONE v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2019cv04638
Plaintiff:
JUANIA M ARDIZZONE and JUANIA M. ARDIZZONE
Defendant:
JAMI BROWN, STEPHANIE REED, DUNCAN KRISTOPHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUMINGS v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2019cv04406
Defendant:
RYAN MCCORKLE and CITY OF MUNCIE
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR CUMINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VERNON v. WINKLE et al
as 1:2019cv04293
Defendant:
JOSEPH WINKLE, JOSEPH CHASE WINKLE, CHASE HUNTER and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE VERNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
