Cases 11 - 20 of 728
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Mission Inn et al
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Mission Inn, Mission Motel, Rochester Zen Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ROSEMAN v. COMCAST CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. ROSEMAN
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION d/b/a XFINITY doing business as XFINITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beydoun v. Mubadala Investment Company et al
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Diab K. Beydoun
Defendant:
Mubadala Investment Company, State of Malaysia, eBay Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VERDIER v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:23-CV-05137
Plaintiff:
VERDIER and VERONICA VERDIER
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST CORPORATION d/b/a Xfinity doing business as XFINITY and CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
VERDIER v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv05137
Plaintiff:
VERONICA VERDIER
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION d/b/a Xfinity, CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. and COMCAST CORPORATION d/b/a Xfinity doing business as XFINITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
HENDRICKSON v. COMCAST CORPORATION
as PAE/2:23-CV-05072
Plaintiff:
HENDRICKSON and DANIELLE HENDRICKSON
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and COMCAST CORPORATION d/b/a XFINITY
HENDRICKSON v. COMCAST CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv05072
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE HENDRICKSON
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION d/b/a XFINITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PRESCOTT v. COMCAST CORPORATION
as PAE/2:23-CV-05040
Plaintiff:
PRESCOTT and STEVEN PRESCOTT
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
