Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Gibbs v. Coupe et al
as 1:2014cv00790
Plaintiff:
Arson I. Gibbs, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, David Pierce, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett et al v. McDonald et al
as 1:2014cv00742
Plaintiff:
Theodore Barrett , Ronald Keis , Wilbur Medley and others
Defendant:
Lawrence McDonald , Jill Mosser , Correct Care Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Baxter et al
as 1:2014cv00708
Plaintiff:
Bryon L. Brown
Defendant:
Baxter, Philip Morgan, Delaware Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00706
Plaintiff:
Ronald Harris
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC , Wendi Caple , Vincent Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hunt v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00320
Plaintiff:
Terry Hunt
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC, Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Avila v. Correct Care Solutions
as 1:2013cv02011
Plaintiff:
Christian Avila
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Respondent:
David Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Limehouse v. Pierce et al
as 1:2013cv01991
Plaintiff:
Taion T. Limehouse
Defendant:
David Pierce and Correct Care Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Delaware Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv01688
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Delaware Dept. of Corrections and Correct Care Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohee v. Danberg et al
as 1:2013cv01243
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Cohee
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Rispoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Baxter et al
as 1:2013cv01189
Plaintiff:
Bryon Lamont Brown
Defendant:
Baxter, Philip Morgan, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
