Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Covington County, Mississippi v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45417
Defendant:
RAYMOND SACKLER FAMILY, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COVINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Covington v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01361
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joyce Covington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zelesnik et al v. GE Healthcare et al
as 1:2018cv02443
Defendant:
Pittsburgh PA, Cleveland Ohio, Senator Sherrod Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Zelesnik and Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zelesnik v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 2:2018cv01101
Defendant:
Delta, Longhorn, Pot Belly and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zelesnik v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2018cv00685
Defendant:
Delta, Longhorn, Pot Belly and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Covington, Kentucky v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45967
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Covington, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Covington v. Cadogen et al
as 1:2018cv00511
Defendant:
Jeremy Oppy and Anthony Cadogen
Plaintiff:
Billy J. Covington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington v. Kanan Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01453
Defendant:
Kanan Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a King Nut Company and Kanan Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Violet Covington
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Covington City v. Purdue Pharma LP, et al
as 1:2018op45661
Plaintiff:
Covington City
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv01513
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
