Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Crawford v. Doyle et al
as 9:2013cv00189
Petitioner:
Robert Crawford
Respondent:
Jay Doyle, Lori Thibodeau and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ogden et al v. Draper et al
as 9:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
Heather Ogden , Clinton Andrews , Tim Arthur and others
Defendant:
Melinda Draper, Mary Fields and Thomas Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hilde v. Roosevelt County et al
as 4:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Chad Arnold Hilde
Defendant:
Roosevelt County, City of Poplar, Montana Department of Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conyers v. State of Montana Roosevelt County et al
as 4:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
Kevin Conyers
Defendant:
Matt Wallace, Tim Lingle, Loy Sprague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamb et al v. Kemper Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ric Lamb and Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kemper Corporation , Crawford and Company and David Allen Hassa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fortune et al v. Thompson et al
as 4:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Clifford Fortune, Julie Fortune, Theo P. Crawford and others
Defendant:
Leslie Thompson, Leslie Weldon and Region One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Wallace v. N. Cheyenne Corrections Officers et al
as 1:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
N. Cheyenne Corrections Officers, Crow Corrections Dept., F.C.I. Sheridan, OR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Astrue
as 9:2007cv00157
Plaintiff:
Caren L. Crawford
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ritchie v. United States of America et al
as 9:2007cv00001
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Ritchie
Defendant:
United States of America, Social Security Administration, Toralf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
